2002 Daewoo Kalos vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Kalos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Kalos would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Kalos (71 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Kalos (104 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Kalos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Kalos | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Daewoo | Renault |
Model | Kalos | Clio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1148 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.7 seconds | 15 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |