2002 Daewoo Kalos vs. 2011 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Ford E-150 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Kalos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Kalos would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (92 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1370 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Ford E-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford E-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-150 (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2011 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. 2011 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 2002 Daewoo Kalos has manual transmission. 2002 Daewoo Kalos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Kalos | 2011 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Kalos | E-150 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2093 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.6 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 125 L |