2002 Daewoo Kalos vs. 2012 Audi R8

To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Kalos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Kalos would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 433 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (92 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Kalos.

Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (530 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. 2012 Audi R8 has automatic transmission and 2002 Daewoo Kalos has manual transmission. 2002 Daewoo Kalos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi R8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Daewoo Kalos 2012 Audi R8
Make Daewoo Audi
Model Kalos R8
Year Released 2002 2012
Body Type Hatchback Convertible
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 1399 cc 5200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 10 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 92 HP 525 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 8000 RPM
Torque 130 Nm 530 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 6500 RPM
Drive Type Front AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automated manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 4435 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1905 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1245 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2649 mm
Fuel Consumption 6.1 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 8.6 L/100km 19.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 90 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]