2002 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2004 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2004 Pontiac Montana is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pontiac Montana (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Pontiac Montana is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pontiac Montana (298 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm). This means 2004 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. 2004 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2002 Daewoo Lanos has manual transmission. 2002 Daewoo Lanos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Lanos | 2004 Pontiac Montana | |
Make | Daewoo | Pontiac |
Model | Lanos | Montana |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1348 cc | 3392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 95 L |