2002 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2005 Isuzu Ascender
To start off, 2005 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Isuzu Ascender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Isuzu Ascender (275 HP) has 201 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu Ascender weights approximately 994 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Isuzu Ascender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu Ascender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Isuzu Ascender (373 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Isuzu Ascender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Daewoo Lanos | 2005 Isuzu Ascender | |
| Make | Daewoo | Isuzu |
| Model | Lanos | Ascender |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1348 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 275 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 102 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 2004 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 82 L |
