2002 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 1,423 cc, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 65 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (118 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Lanos | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Daewoo | Volkswagen |
Model | Lanos | Polo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1348 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 77.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 45 L |