2002 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2008 Peugeot 307
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 307 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 1,997 cc, 2008 Peugeot 307 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Peugeot 307 weights approximately 268 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Lanos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Peugeot 307 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2008 Peugeot 307 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. 2008 Peugeot 307 has automatic transmission and 2002 Daewoo Lanos has manual transmission. 2002 Daewoo Lanos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Peugeot 307 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Lanos | 2008 Peugeot 307 | |
Make | Daewoo | Peugeot |
Model | Lanos | 307 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1348 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1278 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 50 L |