2002 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1975 Volvo 66

To start off, 2002 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Matiz.

Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Volvo 66 (94 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm). This means 1975 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Matiz. 1975 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 2002 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2002 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: