2002 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1953 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Daewoo Rezzo | 1953 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Rezzo | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
