2002 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 695 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo (145 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Daewoo Rezzo | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Seat |
| Model | Rezzo | 600 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2010 mm |
