2002 Daihatsu Copen vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2002 Daihatsu Copen is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daihatsu Copen (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daihatsu Copen should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 58 kg more than 2002 Daihatsu Copen.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daihatsu Copen (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Daihatsu Copen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daihatsu Copen | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Daihatsu | Riley |
Model | Copen | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 25 L |