2002 Daihatsu Copen vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daihatsu Copen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daihatsu Copen would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford F-150 (355 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 2002 Daihatsu Copen. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daihatsu Copen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1763 kg more than 2002 Daihatsu Copen. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford F-150 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Daihatsu Copen. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford F-150 (515 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daihatsu Copen. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daihatsu Copen. 2013 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 2002 Daihatsu Copen has manual transmission. 2002 Daihatsu Copen will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daihatsu Copen | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Copen | F-150 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 515 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 2593 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 6195 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2464 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3988 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 136 L |