2002 Daihatsu YRV vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daihatsu YRV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daihatsu YRV would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2002 Daihatsu YRV. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daihatsu YRV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1598 kg more than 2002 Daihatsu YRV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daihatsu YRV. (120 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daihatsu YRV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Daihatsu YRV | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
| Model | YRV | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1298 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 90.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.7 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 132 L |
