2002 De Tomaso Guara vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza

To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 De Tomaso Guara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 De Tomaso Guara would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 De Tomaso Guara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 De Tomaso Guara (305 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2011 Kia Cadenza. (269 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 De Tomaso Guara should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Cadenza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 375 kg more than 2002 De Tomaso Guara.

Because 2002 De Tomaso Guara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 De Tomaso Guara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 2002 De Tomaso Guara has manual transmission. 2002 De Tomaso Guara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: