2002 Dodge Dakota vs. 1982 Lancia Beta
To start off, 2002 Dodge Dakota is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 118 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 488 kg more than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Because 2002 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lancia Beta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Dakota (196 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Beta. (165 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Dakota | 1982 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Dodge | Lancia |
Model | Dakota | Beta |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 196 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 1048 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2310 mm |