2002 Dodge Dakota vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 91 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Because 2002 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision (300 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Dakota. (196 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Dakota | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Dakota | Vision |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2458 cc | 1689 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 196 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2860 mm |
