2002 Dodge Dakota vs. 2005 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (301 HP) has 183 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1142 kg more than 2002 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Dakota. (196 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Dakota | 2005 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Dodge | GMC |
Model | Dakota | Sierra |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 301 HP |
Torque | 196 Nm | 488 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 2678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3380 mm |