2002 Dodge Dakota vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Dakota would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1004 kg more than 2002 Dodge Dakota.
Because 2002 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Dakota | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Dodge | Fisker |
Model | Dakota | Karma |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3160 mm |