2002 Dodge Durango vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 112 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Durango. (232 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Durango.
Because 2002 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Durango. (399 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Durango.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Durango | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Durango | Calais |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4702 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 399 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
