2002 Dodge M80 vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2002 Dodge M80 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge M80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge M80 (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge M80 should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge M80 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Dodge M80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge M80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge M80 | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | M80 | Elan |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 45 L |