2002 Dodge M80 vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Dodge M80 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge M80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge M80 (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge M80 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 163 kg more than 2002 Dodge M80.
Because 2002 Dodge M80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge M80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge M80 (319 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge M80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge M80 | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | M80 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 55 L |
