2002 Dodge M80 vs. 2005 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge M80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge M80 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 210 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 702 kg more than 2002 Dodge M80.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (320 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge M80. (319 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge M80.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge M80 | 2005 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Dodge | Dodge |
| Model | M80 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1837 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 83 L |
