2002 Dodge M80 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge M80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge M80 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge M80 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Dodge M80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge M80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge M80. (319 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge M80.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge M80 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | M80 | CK |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 70 L |