2002 Dodge Neon vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2002 Dodge Neon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Neon.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Neon | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Neon | 25 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 196 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
