2002 Dodge Neon vs. 1987 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2002 Dodge Neon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Neon (114 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1987 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Aerostar.
Because 1987 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Aerostar (160 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm). This means 1987 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Neon | 1987 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1987 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 88 HP |
Torque | 152 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3030 mm |