2002 Dodge Neon vs. 1997 Ford Puma
To start off, 2002 Dodge Neon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1997 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (126 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Neon | 1997 Ford Puma | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | Puma |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2450 mm |