2002 Dodge Neon vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Neon would be higher. Both 2002 Dodge Neon and 2004 MG TF are equipped with a 1,796 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG TF should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Neon.
Because 2004 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG TF (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2004 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Neon | 2004 MG TF | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Neon | TF |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |