2002 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Neon.
Because 2013 Toyota Matrix is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Dodge Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Neon. 2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 2002 Dodge Neon has manual transmission. 2002 Dodge Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Neon | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Neon | Matrix |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2600 mm |