2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1953 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (174 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 270 kg more than 1953 Hudson Hornet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Hornet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 1953 Hudson Hornet | |
| Make | Dodge | Hudson |
| Model | Ram | Hornet |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3906 cc | 4810 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2990 mm |
