2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Ram. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 4 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5212 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2880 mm |