2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1379 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Ram | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 5212 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2060 mm |
