2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (174 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (305 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 1964 Holden EK | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | EK |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3906 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 65 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |