2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1968 Holden Monaro
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Monaro (215 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Ram. (174 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Ram.
Because 2002 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Holden Monaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Monaro (443 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 1968 Holden Monaro | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Ram | Monaro |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3906 cc | 5354 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 443 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2830 mm |
