2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1968 Lotus 49
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus 49 would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus 49 (405 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Ram. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus 49 should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1363 kg more than 1968 Lotus 49.
Because 1968 Lotus 49 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus 49. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 1968 Lotus 49 | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Ram | 49 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 5212 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 405 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 516 kg |
