2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1970 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (217 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Ram. (174 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 635 kg more than 1970 Ford Falcon.
Because 2002 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (408 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 1970 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Falcon |
Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3906 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2830 mm |