2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2002 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 1978 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ram | Colt |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3906 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2310 mm |
