2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 914 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (94 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Dodge | Opel |
| Model | Ram | Ascona |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5212 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2580 mm |
