2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1983 Renault Siete
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault Siete would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP) has 176 more horse power than 1983 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1064 kg more than 1983 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault Siete. (84 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 1983 Renault Siete | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | Ram | Siete |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5212 cc | 1106 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 44 HP |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2540 mm |
