2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1989 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1989 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 674 kg more than 1989 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 1989 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | Apollo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5212 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 171 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2610 mm |