2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 659 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 626 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5212 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 167 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2620 mm |