2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1994 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 259 kg more than 1994 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1994 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 1994 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Ram | Cougar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5212 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |