2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1995 Rover 800
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 800 would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1995 Rover 800. (167 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 355 kg more than 1995 Rover 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 800. (225 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 1995 Rover 800 | |
| Make | Dodge | Rover |
| Model | Ram | 800 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5212 cc | 2675 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 1524 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2750 mm |
