2002 Dodge Ram vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 234 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Challenger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3906 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2730 mm |