2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 671 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2002 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 2002 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Ram | Equator |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5212 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 3260 mm |
