2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 459 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (186 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 6 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5212 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 186 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2680 mm |