2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2008 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 349 kg more than 2008 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Ram | 75 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5212 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2750 mm |