2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Colorado. (360 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | Colorado |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5212 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 408 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |