2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Ram. (174 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Ram.
Because 2002 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Ram | UTE |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3906 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
