2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Ram | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | Epica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5212 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 408 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2700 mm |