2002 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2011 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 677 kg more than 2011 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Ram | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Dodge | Honda |
| Model | Ram | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5212 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2436 mm |
